Pacific League Pythagorean Record 2026

Pacific League

Largest gap above expectation ORIX +8.0 wins
Largest gap below expectation SoftBank −5.4 wins

end of Sep 20, 2026 / npbc.media

As of Sep 20, 2026, in the Pacific League the largest gap above the Pythagorean expectation belongs to ORIX (+8.0 wins), while the largest gap below it belongs to SoftBank (−5.4 wins). A positive gap means overperforming the run differential; a negative one, underperforming.

The standings show results, but runs scored and allowed are known to reflect a team's underlying strength more faithfully. This page shows the gap between the Pythagorean expected record and the actual one, and the biggest over- and underperformances of the last 20 seasons - a view of where each club really stands beyond the win-loss table.

Pythagorean expectation

Expected records from runs scored and allowed, prorated over decisions and compared with the actual record. Ties drop out of the denominator, as in the official NPB percentage.

Pacific League Gap vs expectation end of Sep 20, 2026 npbc.media ← Actual below expected Actual above expected → SoftBank −5.4 Seibu +3.6 Nippon-Ham −0.1 ORIX +8.0 Lotte +4.7 Rakuten −2.2

Scroll right to see the full chart

Pacific League Gap vs expectation end of Sep 20, 2026 npbc.media ← Actual below expected Actual above expected → H −5.4 L +3.6 F −0.1 B +8.0 M +4.7 E −2.2

Pacific League

Scroll right for more

Team Actual RS/RA Pythagorean pct Expected W-L Diff
SoftBank 84 - 47 - 3 652 / 429 .683 89.4 - 41.6 −5.4
Seibu 74 - 56 - 4 471 / 430 .542 70.4 - 59.6 +3.6
Nippon-Ham 73 - 59 - 3 563 / 500 .554 73.1 - 58.9 −0.1
ORIX 63 - 70 - 2 467 / 565 .414 55.0 - 78.0 +8.0
Lotte 58 - 68 - 3 453 / 537 .423 53.3 - 72.7 +4.7
Rakuten 52 - 78 - 1 432 / 519 .417 54.2 - 75.8 −2.2
Advertisements

Biggest overperformers, 2006-2025: top 2

Reference values based on archived game results (runs) and official final standings. Club names are shown as they were at the time; years within the last 50 seasons link to that season's pennant race page.

Scroll right for more

Year Team Record RS/RA Expected wins Diff
2024 Tohoku Rakuten Golden Eagles 67 - 72 - 4 492 / 579 59.2 +7.8
2025 Tohoku Rakuten Golden Eagles 67 - 74 - 2 446 / 526 59.9 +7.1

Biggest underperformers, 2006-2025: bottom 4

Scroll right for more

Year Team Record RS/RA Expected wins Diff
2021 Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks 60 - 62 - 21 564 / 493 68.5 −8.5
2013 Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks 73 - 69 - 2 660 / 562 81.4 −8.4
2008 Tohoku Rakuten Golden Eagles 65 - 76 - 3 627 / 607 72.6 −7.6
2023 Hokkaido Nippon-Ham Fighters 60 - 82 - 1 464 / 496 66.7 −6.7
Advertisements

What the Pythagorean expectation is

The Pythagorean expectation is an empirical formula devised by Bill James, the father of sabermetrics: it estimates a team's expected winning percentage from the ratio of runs scored to runs allowed. The original insight - winning percentage roughly tracks runs squared over the sum of runs squared and runs allowed squared - gave the formula its theorem-like name; in practice the exponent is tuned slightly away from 2.

The expected records on this page multiply the Pythagorean percentage by the number of decisions. Ties drop out of the denominator, exactly as in the official NPB percentage, so expected wins plus expected losses always equal actual wins plus losses.

Advertisements

Reading the gap: it is not all luck

Overperforming the expectation reflects an ability to win close games - bullpen quality, late-game management - as well as the bounce of one-run games. Underperformance often comes from a mix of blowout wins and narrow losses. Not all of the gap is luck, but extreme gaps are known to move back toward the expectation in following seasons.

The list at the bottom of the page (covering the last 20 seasons) gives a sense of scale: gaps around plus or minus ten wins are among the largest on record there.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Pythagorean winning percentage?

An empirical formula by Bill James that estimates a team's expected winning percentage from runs scored and allowed; its theorem-like shape gave it the name.

Why do actual records differ from expected records?

Because the same run totals can be distributed differently - winning the close ones versus piling up blowouts. Bullpen quality, late-game management and one-run-game fortune all show up in the gap, and extreme gaps tend to regress the following season.

How do ties affect the expected records?

They do not. Expected records are prorated over decisions only, so the number of ties leaves them unchanged - the same convention as the official NPB winning percentage, where ties drop out of the denominator.

Advertisements

Related articles