Background - The 2011 Unified Ball Reform
Starting in the 2011 season, NPB unified the official baseball used across all 12 teams. Previously, different teams used balls from different manufacturers, creating variations in batted ball distances across stadiums. The unified ball, manufactured by Mizuno, was a 'dead ball' with a lower coefficient of restitution aligned with international standards. In its first year, league-wide home runs dropped approximately 30% from the previous year, and batting statistics declined across the board. The extremely pitcher-friendly environment drew complaints from hitters.
The Secret Specification Change - 2013 Suspicions
When the 2013 season began, home run numbers surged compared to the previous year. Suspicions spread among players and media that the ball had been changed. In June, the Asahi Shimbun reported that, based on interviews with Mizuno, NPB had instructed an increase in the coefficient of restitution for the 2013 season balls. In other words, NPB had changed the official ball specifications without notifying players, teams, or media.
Commissioner Kato's False Statements and Resignation
At a press conference following the reports, Commissioner Ryozo Kato initially claimed he was unaware of the specification change. However, subsequent investigation revealed that Kato himself had approved the change, exposing his statement as false. The players' union protested strongly, and criticism erupted from team owners as well. Kato resigned as commissioner in October 2013. It was an unprecedented situation in which the highest authority in professional baseball was forced to resign due to a cover-up and false statements.
Impact on Players - Legitimacy of Statistics and Records
The unified ball scandal raised questions about the legitimacy of player statistics and records. Batting declines during the 2011-2012 dead ball era were caused by ball specifications, not declining player ability. Conversely, batters whose numbers improved in 2013 may have benefited from the ball change. For pitchers, strong performances in 2011-2012 may have been overvalued due to the ball's influence. From the perspective of record fairness, the unified ball scandal left an indelible mark on NPB history.
Books on sports governance are also helpful
Governance Lessons - The Cost of Opaque Management
The essence of the unified ball scandal was not the specification change itself but the governance failure of concealing it. Secretly making changes fundamental to the sport and then layering false explanations after discovery shook NPB's organizational credibility to its foundations. Following this incident, NPB established systems to publicly disclose official ball specifications and regularly publish quality inspection results. However, as of 2014, challenges persisted regarding commissioner independence and decision-making transparency. The unified ball scandal is remembered as a lesson in the importance of transparency and accountability in professional sports organizations.
The Science of COR - Numbers That Proved the Cover-Up
The unified ball's coefficient of restitution (COR) was specified to fall between 0.4134 and 0.4234. Balls manufactured for 2011-2012 were produced near the lower limit at approximately 0.4150, reducing batted ball exit velocity. The 2013 balls were raised to approximately 0.4210, near the upper limit, resulting in several meters of additional carry on identical swings. This difference was statistically significant and sufficient to affect league-wide home run rates. The fundamental issue was not the adjustment itself but NPB's decision to withhold the figures, treating adjustments within the specified range as exempt from disclosure obligations.
Players' Union Response and Institutional Reform Demands
Immediately after the June 2013 reports, Players' Association chairman Motohiro Shima issued an emergency statement demanding full disclosure and preventive measures from NPB. The union submitted reform proposals centering on public release of decision-making records, mandatory advance notification to players before future specification changes, and establishment of independent third-party quality inspections. NPB introduced periodic publication of inspection results in autumn 2013 and began notifying the union before ball specification changes. However, the union's demand for an independent inspection body was not realized, and testing remained under NPB's internal oversight.
Structural Conflict of Interest Within NPB
At the root of the unified ball scandal lay a structural conflict of interest: NPB simultaneously serves as guardian of competitive rules and operator of professional baseball as a commercial entertainment business. Home run frequency directly affects attendance and television ratings, giving NPB financial stakes in the outcome. The extreme pitcher dominance of 2011-2012 raised commercial concerns, and the COR increase was not unrelated to the business motivation of making games more exciting. As long as competitive integrity oversight and revenue pursuit reside in the same organization, such distorted decisions remain structurally possible. MLB delegates ball specification management to an independent body, highlighting the institutional gap with NPB.