How Umpire Evaluation Works
Approximately 60 umpires serve in NPB, under the unified management of the NPB umpiring department since the Central and Pacific League umpiring divisions merged in 2011. The NPB Umpiring Department conducts year-round evaluations across four categories: strike-ball accuracy, out-safe accuracy, game management (pace, conflict resolution), and rules knowledge. Tracking system introduction in the 2020s enabled objective quantification of strike zone accuracy. MLB introduced Zone Evaluation in 2008, with NPB following approximately 15 years later. Average umpire accuracy is approximately 90-92%, but drops to 70-75% on borderline pitches.
Technology Transforming Umpiring
Tracking technology is fundamentally changing umpiring. NPB began testing Automated Ball-Strike (ABS) systems in farm games from 2022. ABS uses cameras and sensors to track pitch trajectories and automatically determine strike zone passage. MLB deployed ABS in select minor league games in 2024, with umpires receiving calls via earpiece in a challenge system. NPB discusses first-team ABS adoption, but reconciling with the traditional view that human judgment is part of baseball remains challenging. Former Hanshin manager Akifu Okada stated that machine-judged calls would remove baseball's flavor, representing the cautious faction's prominent voice.
Umpire Career Paths
Becoming an NPB umpire requires attending the Professional Baseball Umpire School (held each December) and passing entrance exams with approximately 10% acceptance rate. New umpires spend 3-5 years in the farm system before first-team promotion. First-team umpire annual salaries range from 10-15 million yen for veterans. Compared to MLB umpires averaging approximately $400,000 (about 60 million yen), NPB umpire compensation falls significantly short. The pinnacle is serving as home plate umpire for the Japan Series or All-Star Game - the highest honor in umpiring. Mandatory retirement is at 57, with 30-plus year careers not uncommon.
Challenges and Reform
NPB's umpiring system faces several challenges. The primary issue is insufficient accountability for incorrect calls. MLB expanded replay review in 2014, allowing managers to challenge and overturn calls. NPB introduced replay review in 2010 but with limited scope - ball-strike calls remain unreviewable. Former SoftBank manager Sadaharu Oh stated that umpires are human and make mistakes, emphasizing the importance of systems to acknowledge and correct errors. Improving umpire accuracy, phased ABS introduction, and better umpire compensation are essential initiatives for elevating NPB game quality.
NPB Umpires in International Comparison
Significant operational differences exist between MLB and NPB umpiring. MLB employs 76 full-time umpires who rotate across all ballparks throughout the season. NPB's approximately 60 umpires have been centrally managed by the NPB umpiring department since the 2011 merger and work games in both leagues. Korea's KBO has roughly 30 umpires and Taiwan's CPBL about 20, both using unified management systems modeled after MLB. Technology adoption timelines also differ: MLB began Zone Evaluation in 2008 and expanded replay review in 2014. KBO introduced video review in 2009, one year before NPB. For umpire training, MLB maintains a permanent school in Florida, whereas NPB offers only an annual short-term course each December. International tournament exchanges provide growing opportunities for technical improvement, but institutional gaps remain substantial.
Consistency and Individual Strike Zone Variation
Individual variation in strike zones among umpires has long been noted by players and fans. Accumulated tracking data has made these differences numerically visible. Some umpires call a wide outside corner while others favor the low zone, with per-game data analysis revealing each umpire's tendencies. In MLB, unofficial accuracy evaluations called Umpire Scorecards are published after each game and widely referenced by fans and players. Fan communities performing similar analysis exist for NPB, but official data is not publicly released. Consistency is a separate evaluation axis from accuracy; maintaining the same standard throughout a game matters greatly. An inconsistent umpire, even one with high overall accuracy, struggles to earn player trust.
Communication Between Umpires and Players
The relationship between umpires and players directly affects fairness of calls and smooth game progression. NPB rules do not obligate umpires to explain call rationale to players, yet experienced umpires possess skills to ease game tension through appropriate communication. Conversely, ejections must be strictly applied against emotional arguments. In the 2023 season, ejections totaled approximately 10 across both leagues. MLB began equipping umpires with microphones in 2016 to communicate replay review explanations to spectators. This reportedly deepened fan understanding and reduced frustration toward umpires. Similar transparency measures are under discussion in NPB. When umpires convey the reasoning behind rule applications, it increases player acceptance and reduces unnecessary protests.
Does NPB Have Umpire Scorecards?
In MLB, Umpire Scorecards, which use tracking data to let fans grade and publish the accuracy of the plate umpire's calls game by game, have become firmly established. In NPB there is no mechanism by which the leagues or the umpiring department publish call accuracy for individual umpires, and the internal evaluations are not disclosed either (as of August 2026). At the same time, unofficial efforts by fans to compile and share plate umpire calls using publicly available tracking data have begun to appear around NPB as well, and the appetite for making calls visible is steadily growing. A situation in which the official side releases no accuracy data while only fan-made grading spreads reflects a vacuum of accountability, and it can be counted as one of NPB's governance problems.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q. Are the records of NPB umpires (their call accuracy) made public?
They are not. Evaluations by the NPB Umpiring Department stay in internal documents, and there is no way to check the call accuracy of an individual umpire officially (as of August 2026).
Q. What happens to an umpire who makes a blown call?
As a rule, neither an explanation nor a punishment is announced publicly. It is said to be reflected in the internal evaluation, but the fact that the process is invisible from outside has drawn criticism.