What Is Tanking - Definition and Context in NPB
Tanking refers to the strategy of intentionally sacrificing wins in a current season to secure higher draft picks for future rebuilding. In MLB, the Houston Astros and Chicago Cubs famously employed this approach in the 2010s, winning the World Series in 2017 and 2016 respectively. NPB's draft system differs fundamentally from MLB's: rather than awarding the top overall pick to the worst team via a straight reverse-order (waiver) system, NPB uses a lottery-bid format in which all 12 teams can nominate the same player in the first round. This means finishing last does not guarantee access to the best amateur talent. However, certain structural changes over the years, such as the separate high-school draft introduced in 2005 and partial waiver elements added from 2008, have occasionally created scenarios where losing more games could yield marginal advantages. This article examines whether tanking is a viable or even tempting strategy within NPB's institutional framework.
Find books about Tanking Allegations in NPB on Amazon
The 2004 Kintetsu Dissolution - A Case Study in Structural Decline
The closest NPB has come to a tanking-like scenario is the demise of the Osaka Kintetsu Buffaloes in 2004. Despite winning the Pacific League pennant in 2001, highlighted by Hirotoshi Kitagawa's legendary pinch-hit walk-off grand slam, Kintetsu's parent company Kintetsu Railway was absorbing annual losses of roughly 4 billion yen from the baseball operation. The 2003 season ended with a last-place finish at 55-82-3, and the club slashed payroll and shifted to younger, cheaper players. In June 2004, a merger with Orix was announced, triggering NPB's first-ever player strike on September 18-19. While Kintetsu's decline was driven by financial distress rather than deliberate tanking, the case illustrates how intentionally weakening a roster can accelerate a vicious cycle of fan attrition and revenue collapse.
How NPB's Draft System Deters Tanking
NPB's draft contains several structural features that discourage tanking. First, the first-round lottery-bid system allows every team to target the same player, with ties broken by random draw. Finishing last provides no guaranteed access to the top prospect. Second, while rounds two onward follow reverse-order selection, the unpredictability of the first-round lottery significantly reduces the incentive to lose. Third, NPB's ikusei (development) draft allows clubs to sign players outside the 70-man active roster at minimal cost. SoftBank famously developed Kodai Senga (2010 ikusei 4th round) and Takuya Kai (2010 ikusei 6th round) into frontline contributors through this pathway. These mechanisms collectively ensure that deliberately losing games yields far less competitive advantage in NPB than in MLB's former straight-waiver system.
Related books are also helpful
MLB Comparisons and Implications for NPB
From 2012 to 2017, the Houston Astros lost over 100 games in three consecutive seasons before building a championship roster around high draft picks like Carlos Correa and Alex Bregman, culminating in a 2017 World Series title. This blueprint inspired multiple MLB teams to tank simultaneously by 2018, prompting the league to introduce a draft lottery in 2023. To avoid a similar trajectory, NPB should maintain its lottery-bid first round while considering expanded revenue sharing and financial support for lower-revenue clubs. The KBO's 2024 introduction of a draft lottery also offers a useful reference point. Given NPB's compact 12-team structure, even one team engaging in tanking can materially damage league-wide entertainment value and broadcast revenues. A dual approach combining institutional safeguards with proactive financial assistance is essential to preserving competitive balance.